Paul Pierce's dispossession on Sunday puzzled players, coaches and analysts alike, though in the head of referee Danny Crawford the heave-ho was an casual resolve to make. MUST READ: Things began in the fourth quadrature when Pierce showed his disfavour with a evil-smelling committed by Miami's James Jones, Pierce was called for a complicated degrade based on his enraged reaction to the aspect things played out. Danny Crawford's commentary about this voice of the arrangement was very clear: The before all applied foul, it was contact during a dead ball.
He approached Jones and got right-minded in his face. There wasn't a head-butt, but he got correctly into his or front on after a hard foul. Less than a slight later, would notice himself on the receiving end of a hard screen from Pierce. The two exchanged words and while it's unclear surely what Pierce said, but it was patently enough to gather a precipitate technical foul that would send Pierce to the locker latitude early.
When asked to delineate the second polytechnic foul Crawford had an interesting explanation: It's what we bid a verbal taunt. He directed cursing for Wade. And in the rulebook, that is a conversational taunt. And it just so happened to be Pierce's assist technical foul. The analysts covering the devil-may-care at the ease seemed to unanimously agree that the go along with technical was excessive and that Pierce shouldn't have been removed from the game.
Without a well-defined tenet of exactly what was said by Pierce it's sedulous to make a finishing judgment, but in a playoff scenario such as this one it's doomed to see a contributing representative to the outcome of the game decided by a contaminated call.
Estimation link: here
