"After reading Krugman's abhorrent segment on 9/11, I cancelled my obligation to the New York Times this AM," Rumsfeld tweeted Monday. Krugman has been intriguing fever for the blog, posted Sunday forenoon as the country prominent 10 years since the Sept. 11 attacks -- though he tried to establish a digital railing against the backlash, saying in his duty that he would not agree to comments on it "for unsubtle reasons." Joseph Burgess, in the division of The New York Times' noted editor, said the firm has so far heard from about 100 readers concerning Krugman's post.
"Most readers have bewitched exception with Mr. Krugman's blog despatch to this point," Burgess wrote in an email. He esteemed the department does not pass judgment on Krugman's mind writing. In the six-paragraph post, Krugman speculated that the Sept. 11 ceremonies would be "subdued" because of a civil mortification over the country's answer to the tragedy, which he said became a "wedge issue.
" "Fake heroes feel attracted to Bernie Kerik, Rudy Giuliani, and, yes, George W. Bush raced to legal tender in on the horror. And then the decry was employed to confirm an unconnected strive the neocons wanted to fight, for all the ill-treat reasons," Krugman wrote.
Regards with reverence post: click here
