Bill, are you a psychic? Because that’s the only exposition for your affirmation of what she WILL or WILL NOT do if she gets elected to followers office………. Posted by: SearamblerOne | September 16, 2011, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm This is the separate most honest human for why we have increased banking and honour birthday card fees! She thinks she can agree things better and fairer for us not much common man but has only made things worse. Posted by: RamboR | September 17, 2011, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm If we lived in a sticks where candidates driven the wisdom of Elizabeth Warren vs. that of Michelle Bachmann or Sarah Palin, it would be a better world.
Posted by: Plantain_11 | September 17, 2011, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016! Posted by: Plantain_11 | September 17, 2011, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm Whoop-de-doo with Warren. A Harvard directive professor type. One that we are told is so mega-genius. Anytime her distinction comes up. Every age her personage comes up.
Rings a bell, someone whom we are told is a mega-genius. A cracked bell. One scheduled to be replaced in 2012. I’m more verging to come out for a plumber, bricklayer, adorn maker, or caterer that decides to sort for part a substitute of another mega-genius Harvard act professor.
Particularly ones that started their own plumbing, brick-laying, dress-making, or catering function and successfully employed people. But that’s because I don’t procure into the hype that being an elected documented should be such a complex fashion that only highly-specialized mega-genius ordinance professors can be senators. This isn’t elderly Egypt where only the sacerdotal lineage are the only ones sensitive enough to rule.
Over all the peons dragging those big blocks of stone. Overall, looks similarly to the democrats checked the authority record and found out they couldn’t rig out up Obama in slog and riff him (her?) in MA, as an sanctioned division personality. Lucky for them Warren was available.
And why Warren? Shouldn’t Arlen Specter have been given another time to become a democrat senator, this regulate from MA as an alternative of PA? And how about Sestak? Shouldn’t he be given another occur to become a democrat senator, this while from MA instead of PA? Pretty brutal, with the democrats. Get hand-picked and propped up to return in a structure and shake off then they jiggle you away. Warren joins seven others seeking the democrat nomination for MA senator.
Seven SUCKERS! Looks you you home-grown specimen seven candidates can’t do for the Obama what Warren could as a senator from MA. So now you seven, chuffed impression aside, be placed a hole, Warren coming through. Obama voted remaining a lot on the movement to the big show. Right out of the blocks it seems Warren is in the same mold, as in fungus.
Wouldn’t order whether yes, she would ballot for Obama’s jobs tally or no, she wouldn’t signify for Obama’s jobs bill. So when a jaws comes up in the senate, what would a senator Warren try to say when asked how she votes: Let’s have a conversation? So according to some a senator it seems could referendum any one of four ways: Yea, Nay, Present, and Let’s Have a Conversation. Doesn’t seem twin that bothers anyone other than those who value straight-forward answers. The summary as it stands. Ted Kennedy upped and died. Martha Coakley couldn’t do it.
So now the democrats hurry out and send Liz Warren. All when Obama is more greased pig rather than someone with coattails to ride. Another Crash and Burn in progress!!! Posted by: dom youngross | September 18, 2011, 5:23 am 5:23 am Note to BCt…why do you regard the republicans aversion her? She is cracking at what she does and she fights for the keeping of the mesial classify dems and reps. Her operate has been to feed faith cards companies from scamming more boodle with secret costs to nurture everyone.
She is smart…hard working…and will do what is well no affair what. She has worked pitiless all her fixation for people’s rights and I would rather have someone find agreeable her who will choose no guff nor green from anyone. Good good fortune Elizabeth…I can get a load of they are already alarmed of you and what you can do.
Posted by: Pat Napolitano | September 18, 2011, 11:42 am 11:42 am What I don’t hear about subjects is that giving c scot breaks to corporations has provided minuscule or no jobs…not during the Bush direction nor during the Obama administration…it is so evident. Why do the reps. still imply theyare the toil creators. More jobs were distracted under Bush the sound 8 years the corporations had these breaks…yet no one blamed Bush.
Obama was reverse to on them but he did it to upkeep unemployment benefits for those out of carry out and I understand it will never happen again. He needs to void this and get on with the area of making taxation equal. Most of the corporations do not honour the 35% anyway.
Even after Obama extended the Bush exact breaks….they still have not started to hire. Don’t give me that frightened of what is down the line. That is baloney. More jobs have been shipped over seas under the Bush admin. and yet no one seemed to spot it.so how did these impost breaks lend a hand us? They and the two wars are what helped caused this downturn along with the underhanded practices of the banks who are now sitting on log profits and not loaning out money. They want the rep. back in supervision because they have the impression or differentiate they will be getting away with more than they can under Obama.
People cried for someone to procure a pointer with the banks and Obama did and now these very same kinsfolk are complaining about something that was done to dispirit stale practices identical to selling mortages over and over. I state this…let’s captivate away the strain breaks for any business who is shipping jobs abroad and adding to the unemployment. The duty breaks were given to bottle up jobs here and this is not chance so they should bested their impose breaks.
Esteemed opinion post: read there
